| ||||||||
|
RUNNER UP Would You Buy a Wrecking Ball for This Man? Jim Lesczynski wants to become New York City’s last Public Advocate
by Yori Yanover
y neighbor Jim Lesczynski is running
as the Libertarian party’s candidate for
Public Advocate, not because he thinks
he’ll do a better job than the current advocate,
Democrat Betsy Gotbaum, but because
he hopes to abolish her office.
It’s a costly office, he says, with a $3
million annual budget which pays for
very little. According to the PA’s own web
page, it features an Ombudsman Services
Unit, which assists constituents with complaints,
problems, and inquiries involving
government-related services. The unit
provides information and referrals and
works closely with City agencies to find
solutions to problems.
In other words, everything a call to 311
or your community board would have taken
care of, but with no real power. “The
Public Advocate used to be next in line to
succeed the mayor,” Lesczynski argues.
The advocate was a kind of councilman at-large with a vote. But since the city
wrote its new charter, the office has been
stripped of its council vote.
“If I am elected Public Advocate, I
promise to report to work just long enough
to fire the staff and padlock the office,”
promises Jim.
But Libertarians would probably abolish
311, too, and the community boards
are not their favorite cup of tea either,
the way they zone away a man’s right
to do what he wants with his property.
“Government exists to keep people from
killing each other and taking each other’s
property,” Lesczynski asserts. And
that’s the view of mainstream Libertarians
—the more extreme ones won’t even
vote, that’s how much they mistrust government.
There’s no doubt that candidate Jim
Lesczynski is not expecting to actually
win this race. Betsy Gotbaum will probably
get re-elected, continue to collect
$150 thousand in annual salary and disappear
into another four years of well-fed
obscurity. But wouldn’t it be fun if Jim
somehow did it?
Let’s be clear here: My neighbor Jim
Lesczynski is not someone I would normally
support for public office. Like
most Libertarians, he is a maximalist
on the Second Amendment. So much
so, that his Guns For Tots operation has
earned him a solid reputation as, well,
out there.
“It started out simply enough,” he contends,
“a whimsical protest against an ill advised
amendment to New York City’s
administrative code.” In response to a bill
under consideration in the New York City
Council that would make all toy guns illegal
– even brightly colored water pistols
– his Manhattan Libertarian Party announced
a new “philanthropic” program
that would put toy guns in the hands of
the city’s youth while it was still legal.
The highlight of this effort resulted in
Jim’s unforgettable appearance on Comedy
Central’s Daily Show, in a segment
by fake correspondent Ed Helms, showing
Jim distributing the toy guns outside
P.S. 72 in Harlem.
They never laugh with you on the Daily
Show—that’s a lesson Jim Lesczynski
learned the hard way twice (there was an
update segment). The good folks in Harlem
didn’t get the joke and the situation
was gliding swiftly from humor to drama,
stopping just short of tragedy.
Incidentally, Jim admits freely that the
Libertarian party seems to attract precious
few Black members. “It’s a White male
party,” he concedes, despite the fact that
the party chairman is a Black man. Let’s
face it, we’ve all experienced walking into
a Libertarian party hall only to discover
it’s really a Trekkie convention (the way
to tell them apart is Libertarian acceptance
speeches are not delivered in Klingon).
And Jim gets really fuzzy on issues of
law and order and how exactly gentrification
is good for everybody and how come
he’s Libertarianing away in a cooperative
that was financed by public funds, and
how will this neighborhood survive without
its government sponsored safety net.
But that doesn’t matter. I think my neighbor
Jim Lesczynski deserves to be elected
just to see how he works out the details of
his promise. And it will be entertaining to
see which charity or society or association
will be next to hire Ms. Gotbaum for her
elite connections.
Of course, it’s questionable whether
anyone holding public office is empowered
to take it offline - but Jim Lesczynski
could at least disable the office and spend
the $3 million on toy guns.
| ||||||||